Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 34%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: CNN    MSNBC   NBC    
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
No, just the opposite.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: opposite         
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
You either should go down the independent reporting route, or find small, but respectable, organisations that have peer-reviewing process based on the quality of content, as opposed to its political implications.
Networks like Fox News, CNN, etc. are going to have strong biases, and they are rich enough to afford to disperse of the reporters who do not get in line and survive the social backlash.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: strong biases    independent reporting route   quality of content   first place  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Shepard Smith    Chuck Todd   Liberal news anchor of Meet   work  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
The news media outlet coverages, whether they are locally or Nationally oriented, should overall, be basic journalism oriented.
IE, the who, what, when, where, why, and how any news making situation, came into being.
And educating the Public, from a fair, equal, neutral, and impartial stance.
And Opinion Journalism, is in opposition to what basic journalism is.
When a newspaper endorses a Political individual, they have compromised their abilities, to present any news from their organization, by picking any political individual, over another, by publicly choosing to be unfair, unequal, and partial, to the basic principles of formal journalism.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: news media outlet coverages    basic journalism oriented.IE   Political individual   impartial stance.And Opinion Journalism  
  Relevant (Beta): 47%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/former-fox-contributor-shep-smith-resigning-shows-murdochs-made-business-decision-fox-news
"Former Fox contributor: Shep Smith resigning shows the Murdochs made a “business decision” for Fox News to be pro-Trump"
WRITTEN BY MEDIA MATTERS STAFF
PUBLISHED 10/13/19 12:28 PM EDT
"BRIAN STELTER (HOST): There was also a left-wing conspiracy theory out there about Shep Smith the other day, and I want to debunk it. There was a report in The New York Times that Rupert Murdoch had a meeting with Attorney General Bill Barr. And that’s true, they did meet, but it had nothing to do with Smith resigning a day or two later. In fact, Smith had been thinking about doing this for several weeks. So I want to put that to rest. I do think it speaks volumes, though, that people wonder is someone pulling the strings? I mean, Julie, people do I think legitimately wonder about the Murdochs and their role in shaping Fox News and bringing it further to the right.
JULIE ROGINSKY (FORMER FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR): There's no question. I don't know how much further it could go to the right. I think there are business interests the Murdochs have that the president of the government of the United States, can benefit -- they can benefit from that. So as a result, obviously being on the side of the president, helping the president helps their business interests. I think that's a business decision that they've made. Having said that, I think there's an absence sense of leadership at Fox News. When I was there, Carl, when you were there, I think whatever you thought of the leadership, there was a very strong person at the helm who was able to rein a lot of this in. And I think today in the absence of what, what you have are people like Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity essentially running their own fiefdoms and not really allowing others to have any kind of airtime. So I have spoken to a lot of people who are not Democrats or liberals by any stretch of the imagination unless you think that liberalism -- unless you think that truth has a liberal bias. These are people who are fact-checking the president in realtime. They're seeing the airtime cut off. They're not seeing as much access to the air as they used to have. And that’s a business decision I think the Murdochs are making. And I think it's unfortunate because the Fox News audience is not served well by having uncritical views of what the president is saying. There's no dispute about the fact that the president doesn't always say the truth -- and unless somebody says that on Fox’s air, there’s no way the audience would ever know that. And that’s really unfortunate."
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra